{"id":25721,"date":"2021-05-12T09:19:44","date_gmt":"2021-05-12T06:19:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/?p=25721"},"modified":"2021-05-12T09:19:44","modified_gmt":"2021-05-12T06:19:44","slug":"ips-ioan-robu-nu-a-fost-colaborator-sau-lucrator-al-securitatii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/2021\/05\/12\/ips-ioan-robu-nu-a-fost-colaborator-sau-lucrator-al-securitatii\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00cePS Ioan Robu nu a fost colaborator sau lucr\u0103tor al Securit\u0103\u021bii"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Arhiepiscopia Romano-Catolic\u0103 Bucure\u0219ti dore\u0219te s\u0103 dezmint\u0103 informa\u021biile ap\u0103rute \u00een articolele publicate \u00een mass-media, \u00een perioada 10-11 mai 2021, potrivit c\u0103rora \u00een dosarul nr. 6018\/2\/2020, prin sentin\u021ba civil\u0103 nr. 740 din data de 10 mai 2021, un complet al Cur\u021bii de Apel\u00a0Bucure\u0219ti, Sec\u021bia a VIII-a contencios administrativ \u0219i fiscal ar fi constatat faptul c\u0103 Monseniorul Ioan Robu, fostul Arhiepiscop Mitropolit de Bucure\u0219ti, a avut calitate de lucr\u0103tor al Securit\u0103\u021bii.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00cen primul r\u00e2nd,<\/strong> <strong>persoana judecat\u0103 \u00een dosarul nr. 6018\/2\/2020 NU este Monseniorul Ioan Robu. Este o confuzie regretabil\u0103, fiind vorba de dou\u0103 persoane distincte, chiar dac\u0103 poart\u0103 acela\u0219i nume.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00cen al doilea r\u00e2nd, Arhiepiscopia Romano-Catolic\u0103 Bucure\u0219ti a mai emis anterior o <a href=\"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/2015\/06\/21\/declaratie-arcb-ips-ioan-robu-si-asa-zisa-colaborare-cu-securitatea\/\">declara\u021bie de pres\u0103<\/a> pe aceast\u0103 tem\u0103, preciz\u00e2nd c\u0103 \u00een raport cu Securitatea Statului, Monseniorul Ioan Robu nu a fost nici colaborator, nici informator, dar foarte probabil a fost urm\u0103rit informativ \u0219i operativ, datorit\u0103 func\u021biei pe care o avea \u00een Biserica Catolic\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Monseniorul Ioan Robu a fost parte \u00eentr-o serie de dosare prin care a contestat orice documente care ar fi atestat calitatea de colaborator sau lucr\u0103tor al securit\u0103\u021bii. Astfel, prin urm\u0103toarele hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u0219ti:<\/p>\n<ol start=\"17\">\n<li>decizia nr. 948\/17.03.2017 a Cur\u021bii de Apel Bucure\u0219ti \u00een dosarul 8354\/2\/2016,<\/li>\n<li>decizia nr. 4259\/2019 a \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie \u00een dosarul 8354\/2\/2016 \u0219i<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li>decizia 1562\/2020 a \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie \u00een dosarul 2866\/1\/2019<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><u>se constat\u0103 \u00een mod definitiv \u0219i irevocabil c\u0103 Monseniorul Ioan Robu nu a fost colaborator\/lucr\u0103tor al securit\u0103\u021bii, dup\u0103 cum a atestat \u0219i CNSAS prin adeverin\u021ba nr. 1663\/14.06.2016.<\/u><\/p>\n<p>Monseniorul Ioan Robu nu doar c\u0103 nu a fost aservit Securit\u0103\u0163ii Statului, ci a \u00eenfruntat Securitatea, lupt\u00e2nd pentru drepturile religioase ale cet\u0103\u021benilor catolici, pentru asigurarea unei bune desf\u0103\u0219ur\u0103ri a activit\u0103\u021bii Bisericii Catolice \u00een Rom\u00e2nia \u0219i pentru p\u0103strarea identit\u0103\u021bii catolice \u00een \u021bara noastr\u0103 \u00een acele vremuri grele.<\/p>\n<p>Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere toate aceste informa\u021bii, Arhiepiscopia Romano-Catolic\u0103 Bucure\u0219ti solicit\u0103 publicarea dreptului la replic\u0103 \u0219i actualizarea articolelor \u00een care s-au folosit informa\u021bii inexacte, prin care s-a adus un prejudiciu de imagine Monseniorului Ioan Robu, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t cititorii s\u0103 aib\u0103 acces la informa\u021bii corecte \u0219i obiective.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">Pr. Tarciziu \u0218erban<br \/>\nPurt\u0103tor de cuv\u00e2nt al ARCB<\/p>\n<p>Hits: 1111<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Arhiepiscopia Romano-Catolic\u0103 Bucure\u0219ti dore\u0219te s\u0103 dezmint\u0103 informa\u021biile ap\u0103rute \u00een articolele publicate \u00een mass-media, \u00een perioada 10-11 mai 2021, potrivit c\u0103rora \u00een dosarul nr. 6018\/2\/2020, prin sentin\u021ba civil\u0103 nr. 740 din data de 10 mai 2021, un complet al Cur\u021bii de Apel\u00a0Bucure\u0219ti, Sec\u021bia a VIII-a contencios administrativ \u0219i fiscal ar fi constatat faptul c\u0103 Monseniorul Ioan [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":25722,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57],"tags":[16],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25721"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25721"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25721\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25723,"href":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25721\/revisions\/25723"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcb.ro\/website\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}